Clicky

Close

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Donor CNW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    209
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    337
    Thanked in
    172 Posts

    Why voting for Trump was the right thing to do (7 reasons)

    Why voting for Trump was the right thing to do (7 reasons)
    April 21, 2017

    Now that Trump has already comprehensively betrayed all his campaign promises and that he 100 first days in office are marked by nothing else but total chaos, incompetence, betrayals of his closest friends and allies, recklessly dangerous and utterly ineffective grandstanding in foreign policy, there are a lot of people out there who say “I told you so!”, “how could you take this clown seriously!” and “are you now finally waking up from your delusional state?”. Yes, a superficial survey of what Trump did since he got into the White House could appear to make these nay-sayers look right. But in reality, they are completely wrong. Let me explain why.

    First, what these nay-sayers apparently ignore is that there are innumerable examples in history of the elites turning against each other, usually in times of crises. In the case of Trump, I submit that there overwhelming empirical data out there that a good part of the world elites really and truly were terrified of a possible Trump victory. The kind of hysterical, completely over-the-top hate campaign in which the US Ziomedia engaged in against Trump is something which I have never seen before and which, in my opinion, proves that the Neocon-run propaganda outlets (the Ziomedia, Hollywood) saw Trump as a major danger to their interests. Now, whether Trump had any chance against such powerful “deep state” actors or not is immaterial: Trump was a chance, a possibility and, I would argue, the only option to try to kick the Neocons in the teeth. And don’t give me Sanders or Stein as possible options, they were both 100% fake – just look at how both of them did Hillary’s dirty job for her (Sanders with his endorsement of her even though he was cheated out of a victory and Stein with her ridiculous recount). Even if Trump had just a 1% chance of prevailing, voting for him was an opportunity to achieve regime change in the USA and the American people grabbed it. They did the ethically and pragmatically correct thing. Trump was really the only choice.

    Second, you can think of the elections as a giant opinion poll. What the American voter did is to send two messages urbi et orbi. First to the rest of the planet: Not in our name! We don’t support this regime! And then to the Neocons: we hate you. In fact, we hate you so much that we are willing to even vote for a guy like Trump just because we hate Hillary even more. As to the message to the Ziomedia it was crystal clear: liars! We don’t trust you! Go screw yourselves, we will vote for the man you hate with such a passion precisely because we deny you the right to tell us what to think. Yes, Trump proved to be a fake and a liar himself, but he will also be a one term President as a direct consequence of his betrayals. And it is quite possible that Kushner or Pence will now run the Empire on behalf of his real bosses, but the world will also know that this was not what the American people wanted.

    Third, this gigantic vote of no-confidence in the Ziomedia will now force the regime to engage in all sorts of more or less subtle maneuvers to try to crack down on free speech in the USA. This is good news for two reasons: a) they will fail and b) they will show their true face. YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter and all the others are now becoming overt agents of oppression whereas in the past they still had (an admittedly thin) veneer of respectability. Now that it has become clear that the Internet is the last free-speech zone and that more and more Americans realize that Russia Today or Press TV are far superior news sources than the US Ziomedia, the level of influence of the US propaganda machine will continue to plummet.

    Fourth, if we look at the immoral, self-defeating and, frankly, stupid decisions of Trump in the Middle-East and in Far-East Asia we can at least find some solace in the fact that Trump is now betraying all his campaign promises. Hillary would have done more or less the same, but with what she would definitely present these policies as having a mandate from the American people. Trump has no such excuse, and that is very good indeed. Voting for Trump took the mandate away from the Ziocons.

    Fifth, remember the “basket or deplorables”? “Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic.” If Hillary had been elected, then the ideology which made her characterize the average American as ugly bigot would be ruling the country by now. But she was defeated. Thus, it is becoming undeniable that there are two Americas out there: one which I call the “alliance of minorities” and the other what I would called “real America” or “mainstream America”. The defeat of Hillary has sent a powerful message to these minorities reminding them that they are exactly that – minorities – and that a political agenda centered on the hatred of the majority is not a viable one. This empowering of the majority of US Americans is, I think, a much needed development whose effects will hopefully felt in future elections.

    Sixth, Trump already got one more or less decent Supreme Court Justice in. He might get another one in before he is impeached or his term ends. Hillary would have probably nominated the first Black or Latino genderfluid freak, a Chabad-Lubavitch rabbi or even Alan Dershowitz Himself (with a capital “H”) to the supreme court and dared anybody to vote them down. Of course, compared to the risks of nuclear war, a Supreme Court Justice nominee might not appear to be crucial, but for those living inside the USA such nominations can make a huge difference.

    Seventh and last but not least, nuclear war is simply too horrible and threatens the future of the entire human race. I submit that we all, every one of us, has a moral duty to do everything we can to avoid it and to make it less likely, even if we can only act at the margins. This is one of those very rare cases where a single-issue vote really does make sense. I don’t care how bad Trump turned out to be. In fact, even if he turns out to be even worse than Hillary, I submit that it is absolutely undeniable that on the day the Election took place Hillary was the candidate for war and Trump the candidate for peace. Those who claim otherwise seem to have forgotten that Hillary promised us a no-fly zone over Russian forces in Syria.

    They also forget this absolutely crucial statement made by Hillary Clinton in early December of 2012:

    “There is a move to re-Sovietise the region,” (…) “It’s not going to be called that. It’s going to be called a customs union, it will be called Eurasian Union and all of that,” (…) “But let’s make no mistake about it. We know what the goal is and we are trying to figure out effective ways to slow down or prevent it.”


    There are also persistent rumors that Hillary was the one who told Bill to bomb Serbia. So this woman (sorry, I cannot call her a “lady”) does have a record and that record is a frightening one. God only knows what would have happened if she had become the President. She clearly is a hateful maniac with a personal hate for Putin. There is absolutely no evidence indicating that Trump had that kind of hateful personality.

    So while “Monday morning quarterbacking” is fun, it is also absurd. Those who now tell us “I told you so” are right but for the wrong reasons, whereas those who supported Trump were wrong, but for the right reasons. Trump betrayed his campaign promises, but those who voted for him could not simply assume that he would do that, especially not when there was no reason at all to believe that Hillary would betray hers: does anybody seriously believe that after being elected on a promise of war she would have turned into a dove of peace? Of course not.

    Simply put: Hillary was guaranteed bad. Trump was possibly bad. The logical choice was therefore obvious, especially when ‘bad’ would most likely mean nuclear war.


    http://thesaker.is/why-voting-for-tr...-do-7-reasons/

    %%%







    All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)

  2. #2
    Donor
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Way Out West
    Posts
    462
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    597
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    642
    Thanked in
    295 Posts


    I agree with the Saker that Trump was the lesser of two evils. Since the corporate media is the mouthpiece of the oligarchy -- i.e., politicians they support are invariably neocon/ neoliberal sellouts -- then the fact that the corporate media are trying to get rid of Trump with increasingly stupid Russia rumors is proof that Trump remains an outsider. This fact burnishes his credentials for me.

    The 2016 election was between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, period. That was our choice. One or the other would be POTUS. I remain extremely grateful that it did not turn out to be Hillary.

    That said, the Saker damages his brand with terms like "Ziomedia." Until more people understand that anti-Zionism is not necessarily antisemitism, it is foolish to throw such terms around. I will admit that I have never understood people who see the world through either pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist eyes. That seems like a pretty narrow focus, given all the problems we have in the world.

  3. #3
    Donor CNW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    209
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    337
    Thanked in
    172 Posts


    I have the same opinion as you about the word Zionism, it's different I think from anti-semitism. I have nothing against Jewish people, or any others. I judge them by their actions and I really don't care about that unless they're hurting me or other people. The Israeli government's actions is in my opinion just as bad as ours.
    The Saker should probably define what he means by Ziomedia.

    I think that the election of Trump was a rejection of the ruling oligarchs and disastrous foreign policies, while ignoring the citizens of their own country. I think the Brits did the same with Brexit. The people saw the writing on the wall, didn't like the Brussels Barons running their lives. I guess it's really the same old story, down through the ages, Socialism vs Capititalism.
    I think things will settle down a bit after a few nuclear wars.

  4. #4
    Donor
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    182
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    72
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    146
    Thanked in
    88 Posts


    Far more likely things will abruptly cease after a few nuclear wars.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2017, 04:06 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2017, 10:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •